Rule-based extraction
Use regex, CSS selectors, XPath, or source field mapping when the source layout is stable.
Product
Polytrace helps teams turn emails, attachments, notices, files, and web pages into usable fields, reviewed extracts, and one latest row per tracked item. It supports rule-based extraction when a value lives in a stable location, AI extraction when the language is too variable for rigid rules, and field-level evidence and review so structured outputs stay tied to the underlying record.
Highlights
Use regex, CSS selectors, XPath, or source field mapping when the source layout is stable.
Handle variable language and inconsistent documents without forcing a brittle rule set.
Keep every extracted value tied to supporting source evidence and review metadata.
Create one latest row per contract, vendor, policy, or other tracked item when teams need a usable day-to-day table.
Workflow
Choose the fields that matter to the decision, not every value that happens to exist.
Use rules where the source is stable and AI extraction where variability is high.
Inspect field results with supporting evidence and correction controls where accuracy matters.
Use reviewed extracts, one latest row per tracked item, exception views, or downstream exports based on the workflow.
Push trusted values into monitoring, sharing, routing, or operating views.
Comparison
| Method | Best when | Typical example |
|---|---|---|
| Regex | A value follows a reliable text pattern | Reference number in a subject line or attachment body |
| CSS selector | A web page exposes the value in stable HTML | Status badge or effective date on a portal page |
| XPath | The document structure is predictable but needs precise element targeting | Nested values inside structured page markup |
| Source-path mapping | The source already exposes a clean path to the value | Metadata fields from a structured source payload |
| AI extraction | The signal is expressed in variable language or inconsistent layouts | Free-form email threads, mixed attachments, or long notices |
Some values should be extracted with explicit rules because their location is stable: a notice number in the subject line, a date beside a label, or a status in a predictable HTML element.
Polytrace can handle those cases with regular expressions, CSS selectors, XPath, and source field mapping. When the signal is buried in free-form language or inconsistent attachments, the same workflow can use AI extraction.
Extraction only helps if the team can trust it. Polytrace writes field results with evidence and review metadata so reviewers can see where a value came from and whether it needs correction.
That matters in high-stakes workflows such as renewal dates, vendor issues, claims status, or referral routing, where a downstream decision needs to be explainable.
Many teams do not want a long stream of extracted facts. They want one latest row per contract, vendor, policy, shipment, or case.
For those workflows, Polytrace can keep one latest row per tracked item, based on the fields that define it. Teams get a usable day-to-day table without losing result history.
Human review is part of the workflow. When a reviewer corrects an extraction result, Polytrace can update the result and refresh the latest row without waiting for a full rerun.
That keeps alerts, operating tables, and downstream deliveries aligned with the reviewed truth instead of lagging behind correction work.
The best first extraction workflow is a compact field set tied to one operational decision: the date that triggers a follow-up, the status that drives routing, or the party that determines ownership.
Once that first field set is producing trustworthy outputs, expanding the model becomes much easier because the source capture, review path, and delivery path are already in place.
Where this fits
Related pages
Use the closest product, workflow, or security page to continue the evaluation.
Polytrace helps teams review important outputs before they spread, and correct the record without losing the source trail.
Open pageUse Polytrace for renewal and obligation tracking.
Open pageUse Polytrace for vendor delay tracking.
Open pageSee how source capture, extraction, monitoring, and controlled sharing fit together.
Open pageFAQ
Polytrace can work across messages, attachments, contracts, forms, notices, reports, file previews, and captured web content. Exact rollout scope depends on the workflow and how much of the source record the team needs to keep available.
Yes. Many strong workflows mix both. Teams use explicit rules where the source is predictable and AI extraction where the language or layout is too variable for rigid selectors alone.
That is a common reason teams use Polytrace. When fixed rules are too brittle, AI extraction can turn variable input into reviewable structured fields while keeping the output tied to source evidence.
Yes. For workflows that need one latest row per vendor, contract, case, or other tracked item, Polytrace can keep one up-to-date row based on the fields that define it.
Yes. Review and correction are built into the structured-data workflow so teams can confirm or fix important values before those values drive alerts, shared outputs, or downstream delivery.
Next step
A strong demo starts with one real document set and one field set the team needs to trust.